Thursday, October 23, 2014

LOOMIS: Who sets the 2014 Kansas agenda?

By BURDETT LOOMIS, Insight Kansas | 1/17/2014

Gov. Sam Brownback laid out his state policy agenda Wednesday in his State of the State address. Given our very conservative Republican governor paired with a similar Legislature, one might reasonably assume the chief executive can truly set the table for the coming session.

For the first three years of the Brownback Administration, this was essentially true, albeit with the backing of the Kansas Chamber, Americans for Prosperity and various anti-abortion advocates.

Gov. Sam Brownback laid out his state policy agenda Wednesday in his State of the State address. Given our very conservative Republican governor paired with a similar Legislature, one might reasonably assume the chief executive can truly set the table for the coming session.

For the first three years of the Brownback Administration, this was essentially true, albeit with the backing of the Kansas Chamber, Americans for Prosperity and various anti-abortion advocates.

But 2014 might well tell a different, more complicated story, in part because of the governor’s substantial policy successes to date. For example, income taxes have been slashed, and eliminated for many entities. This means revenues have dropped sharply, putting pressure on many state programs, from K-12 education to corrections.

Thus, although the governor might desire to placate pro-education constituents by proposing statewide all-day kindergarten, he immediately runs into funding problems, opposition from many GOP legislators, and questions as to why he doesn’t propose restoring some previous cuts to schools.

But severe, self-imposed fiscal constraints represent merely one limitation on Brownback’s ability to set the agenda.

The most important contending force, by far, is the Kansas Supreme Court, which might once again require the state to fully fund its constitutional public education obligations. The agenda problems are two-fold. First comes the question of funding the formula, perhaps by playing games with what constitutes educational spending. Busing? Pensions?

Second, and more profoundly, any court ruling calling for substantial funding likely will lead to a constitutional crisis, given that neither the governor nor the Legislature seems willing to comply. In his State of the State address, Brownback explicitly warned the court, with its members a few feet away, to stay away from spending mandates. Although this approach plays well — really well — with his conservative base, a major confrontation with the court presents serious political problems for a sitting governor, if he is seen as nullifying the legitimate ruling of a co-equal branch of government.

Indeed, in 2014 the political implications of setting the policy agenda might well trump the policy effects. If school finance is the 800-pound gorilla in the room this year, Democratic House Minority Leader Paul Davis’ vigorous and well-funded campaign for governor must rank as at least a 600-pound one.

Given the conservative bent of the Kansas electorate over the past two elections, along with the continuing, profound dislike of President Obama and his health care reforms, a formidable challenge to the governor might seem unlikely. But various polls, healthy fundraising and increasing national recognition demonstrate real potential for a Davis upset.

In turn, such a political context might place Brownback at odds with other conservatives. For example, Kansas hospitals and others are prodding the governor to sign on to proposals, adopted in other states, to use Medicaid funds for insuring more Kansans. So far, Brownback has shown little inclination to do this, but a close race might change his mind, much to the dismay of his strongest supporters on the right.

Likewise, the Kansas Chamber has indicated it wants to review the requirement that 20 percent of the state’s energy production come from renewable sources by 2020. And Secretary of State Kris Kobach presents an entire array of unnecessary voter registration issues, which the governor continues to sidestep like a farmer in a field of fresh cow pies.

In large part, Brownback’s lack of control over the state’s agenda means that Kansans might have a fascinating legislative session to observe this spring. With an unexpectedly strong gubernatorial candidate heading up the House minority and a Supreme Court perhaps ready to lay down the gauntlet on school finance, the governor faces a far different set of challenges than he did in the past three years.

Kansans will get a chance to see how well he can play defense, as he keeps his eye on the November elections.

Burdett Loomis is a political science professor at the University of Kansas and a member of the Insight Kansas writers’ group.

comments powered by Disqus